🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial action to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are considering similar bans.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our kids' innocence". Legislation is expected to be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to implement a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to verify the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "an options under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has called on lawmakers to approve a bill raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised guardians to restrict their children from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has passed a advisory resolution calling for a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is provided. Although it cautions of the "addictive" design of these apps, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a solid starting point," stated the European lawmaker driving the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "supported by robust data".

Previously, support gathered behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the government committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. An organization established by the family of a girl who died after viewing harmful online content contends that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for young users," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, action is largely happening at the regional level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a law barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law capping under-16s to one hour of social media time per day, with any further access needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced measures mandating parental consent for under-16s to open social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from some figures to mimic Australia's path, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond the West, further countries are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, world bodies adopt a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

As this global discussion evolves, the actions of Australia and its followers show that policymakers internationally are increasingly content to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.